Kategorie: Open Science

Rawlins, B. (2024). Are Transformative Agreements Worth It? An Analysis of Open Access Publication Data at the University of Kentucky. Library Resources & Technical Services, 68(1). https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.68n1.8211 Open access publishing is continuing to grow as funders such as cOAlition S, National Institutes of Health, and the White House implement mandates and requirements that publicly funded

Dickson, C. (2024). Opening up: A global context for local open access initiatives in higher education. Library Resources & Technical Services, 68(1–2). https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.68n1.8210 Open access policies and mandates can be a useful tool in persuading faculty at higher education institutions around the globe to produce and share open scholarship. But are such policies widely written,

Lerro, J., & Scott, R. E. (2024). Partners in progress: Publishers and librarians support open access publishing. Library Resources & Technical Services, 68(1–2). https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.68n1.8209 (https://journals.ala.org/index.php/lrts/article/view/8209) There is a tendency to discuss open access (OA) publishing as though it is monolithic. Those of us engaged in the work of researching, preparing, and negotiating, however, know OA

Scott, R. E., & Fernandez, M. (2024). Editorial: Open access: one goal, many pathways. Library Resources & Technical Services, 68(1). https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.68n1.8208 How better to celebrate the one-year anniversary of Library Resources & Technical Services (LRTS) becoming fully open access than an issue chock-full of insights, experiences, practices, and data on open access in library settings?

Goddard, M., & Brundy, C. (2024). Open Access Workflows for Academic Libraries. College & Research Libraries, 85(4), 503. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.4.503 There is a growing acceptance of open access funding models among academic publishers and a growing adoption of open access publishing agreements among academic libraries. In this context, libraries are taking on new roles and new

Weirick Johnson, M. & Abumeeiz, S. (2023). The Limits of Inclusion in Open Access: Accessible Access, Universal Design, and Open Educational Resources. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 11(1), eP14399. https://doi.org/10.31274 Introduction: The impacts of open educational resources (OER) are both well-documented and far-reaching. Without mitigating the positive outcomes of OER—including reduced textbook costs, readily

Corredera, E.; Andres, V. (2023). Back to Green. Das Projekt GOAL und das Potenzial von Grün Open Access. LIBREAS. Library Ideas, 44. https://libreas.eu/ausgabe44/corredera-andres/ ‚GOAL – Unlocking the Green Open Access Potential‘ (https://opengoal.ch) ist die kollektive Bestrebung einer Gruppe von wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken zur Förderung des bisher wenig beachteten Potentials von Grün Open Access in der Schweizer

Steiner, T. (2023). Alte Traditionen: zur Rolle von scholar-led publishing und Open Access in den Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften. LIBREAS. Library Ideas, 44. https://libreas.eu/ausgabe44/steiner Der vorliegende Beitrag beleuchtet den Ansatz des scholar-led publishing und zeigt auf, welche Zusammenhänge zwischen scholar-led Initiativen und der klassischen Open Access-Bewegung bestehen. Nach einer kurzen Diskurseinordnung leitet der Beitrag diachron ab,

Dufour, Q., Pontille, D., & Torny, D. (2023). Supporting diamond open access journals: Interest and feasibility of direct funding mechanisms. Nordic Journal of Library and Information Studies, 4(2), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.7146/njlis.v4i2.140344 As Article Processing Charges (APC) has been a growing concern in academia and policy making, the need for a model where both authors and readers do